Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
Q is empty.
The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f3(0, 1, x0)
h1(0)
h1(g2(x0, x1))
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F3(0, 1, x) -> H1(x)
F3(0, 1, x) -> F3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f3(0, 1, x0)
h1(0)
h1(g2(x0, x1))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F3(0, 1, x) -> H1(x)
F3(0, 1, x) -> F3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f3(0, 1, x0)
h1(0)
h1(g2(x0, x1))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F3(0, 1, x) -> F3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f3(0, 1, x) -> f3(h1(x), h1(x), x)
h1(0) -> 0
h1(g2(x, y)) -> y
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f3(0, 1, x0)
h1(0)
h1(g2(x0, x1))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.